On 12/19/06, Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 12/19/06, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] anyone? > > > > Quaint. I can live with that. > > While I'm not against it, python-ideas may be a better name, simply > because it doesn't have a connotation that any conclusions reached on > the list are unlikely to be implemented :-)
Um, that was tongue-in-cheek. My serious proposal was python-4000, but python-ideas sounds better to me because it won't eventually outdate itself. Effbot wrote: > an alternative would be to move concrete 3.0-related implementation > discussions back to python-dev, and keep this list for Python 3.0 PEP > work and "year 3000" stuff. But that's confusing since the 3.0 PEP work is *also* concrete implementation related (at least in my mind it is supposed to be -- no proposal will be accepted unless it's clear how it can be implemented). And there are plenty of developers on python-dev who prefer to stick to python 2.6 work. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
