On 12/19/06, Georg Brandl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - turning list comprehensions into syntactic sugar for generator expressions > > I'd like to point out that there is already my patch for that, which > implements > set comprehensions and list comprehensions exactly as syntactic sugar for > GEs. This, however, affects performance greatly as LCs are executed in their > own > function scope, which isn't necessary. A better implementation would therefore > leave the LC implementation as is, only preventing the name leaking into the > enclosing scope.
Do you think you have it in you to tackle this? -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
