-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Jan 2, 2007, at 6:47 PM, Brett Cannon wrote:
> Are you at least okay with base64, quopri, and uu going? You are just > arguing for the saving of binascii, right? > > Does anyone else care to try to save binascii? base64 and quopri implement specific RFCs so I think they should stay. uu implements a defacto standard, but I don't like its interface (it uses file-like objects instead of strings). For Py3K, I would be in favor of consolidating things, making interfaces consistent, and probably re-homing the modules under a top-level package. - -Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBRZryrXEjvBPtnXfVAQKesQP+IaGMjFcfXKE+wJ3bID4J72V0QLwFtRrP 5smxwHHvNoDFxRSP2YnsN2ISv41p5O8KRnU73tyv6ueFoDG4vNlHp+sDFQefmWzO 9FGA6IVIR8DUzlW5b8VeHAELEIrol4E6k5y6JeS0CjdbdFz9XTZ0UZCG0sM//Dvx V1dYG1ToNKQ= =L6j2 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
