On 1/9/07, Brett Cannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 1/9/07, Mike Klaas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Does the sets module serve any purpose other than backward > > compatibility? Why not remove those module for py3k? > > Same reason that the User* modules still exist I suppose. Plus I > don't know if PyPy or anyone else rely on it for their set/frozentset > implementation.
What's the concern with PyPy and IronPython? Don't they already have copies of the sets module? Collin Winter _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
