On 1/23/07, Thomas Wouters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 1/23/07, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry, for those of us following along at home ;-) could someone
> > explain why we couldn't just introduce a ``sys.get_exception()`` or
> > something like that which would then make the exception (and therefore
> > the traceback) available?
>
> We could, of course, but what's the point? To rename the existing 'exc_info'
> into 'get_exception' and some attribute-retrieval? I'm all for cleanup and
> not looking back, but that's quite a lot of gratuitous breakage, to little
> point. I don't consider it 'weird' or 'bad' or 'a wart' or 'a hysterical
> raisin' that sys.exc_info() returns a tuple of three things.
If I understand it right, all three elements of the sys.exc_info()
tuple are derivable from only the middle element (at least in Python
3.0 where the middle element would always have to be an exception
instance[1])::
def exc_info():
exc = sys.get_exception()
return exc.__class__, exc, exc.__traceback__
So I guess it just seems a little redundant to return a tuple of three
things when two of the three are easily derivable from the third. I
was trying to think of any other API in Python which does something
like this, but I couldn't find one...
[1] http://docs.python.org/lib/module-sys.html
"The values returned are (type, value, traceback). Their meaning is:
... ``value`` gets the exception parameter (its associated value or
the second argument to raise, which is always a class instance if the
exception type is a class object)"
STeVe
--
I'm not *in*-sane. Indeed, I am so far *out* of sane that you appear a
tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity.
--- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
