Thanks! I decided to use your first approach; one can never have too many unit tests! :-)
On 2/14/07, Eduardo EdCrypt O. Padoan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If someone is alread working at this, please ignore this mail: I just > picked because it was ease enough not to do while I wait some other > code to run at work. > I've created two patches to p3yk. They are two alternatives to fix the > broken test_dict.py: > test_dict_1.patch uses the same approach as test_dictviews.py: > transform the dict_view in a set. > test_dict_2.patch is an alternative: I'm not sure if the .items(), > .values() and .keys() should be covered two times (test_dict.py and > test_dictviews.py), so this solves the problem removing this tests > from test_dict.py. > > -- > EduardoOPadoan (eopadoan->altavix::com) > Bookmarks: http://del.icio.us/edcrypt > > _______________________________________________ > Python-3000 mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/guido%40python.org > > > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
