On 20/02/07, Steven Bethard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/20/07, Raymond Hettinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > My recommendation is to take a more conservative route. Let's make dicts as > > simple as possible and then introduce a new collections module entry with > > the > > views bells and whistles. > > Just to clarfiy, you're suggesting that we still change .keys() > .values() and .items() to iterators, right? > > If so, +1. I was also starting to get a bit nervous about the new > complexity of dict(). Putting the view-like behavior into the > collections module makes good sense.
I'm also +1. (I have similar concerns over the "new IO" proposals I've seen, but there's nothing concrete there yet, so I'll save that argument for another day...) Paul _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
