On 3/2/07, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So it was some sort of workaround for exceptions not > being classes? If so, it sounds like we don't need > it any more.
Right. I added it to be able to do something like create classes of exceptions when all we had was string exceptions. Definitely an early mistake I want to correct in Py3k! -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
