On 3/2/07, Collin Winter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/2/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Has anyone tried to create a 2to3 transformer for this? I think it > > should be possible, although there are a few warts (like inserting the > > new code after the docstring, and how to come up with names for the > > anonymous tuple(s), and having to do it for potentially any number of > > arguments. Still, it would require no dataflow analysis, and the > > except transformer already has a similar statement insertion. So I > > think it's doable. > > I can take a crack at this. I had to do similar things for the raise > fixer before switching it over to use with_traceback().
That would be great! You may end up adding some generally useful code for inserting statements into a block... -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
