-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On Mar 5, 2007, at 5:16 PM, Greg Ewing wrote:
> Also I'm not sure I like this idea. It smells like > an abuse of the notion of calling to me. One doesn't > normally expect that calling a callable object has > a side effect on the callable itself. Perhaps, but I think there's a valid use case for calling "next" explicitly, and I would really hate for that to be spelled "it.__next__()". - -Barry -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (Darwin) iQCVAwUBReyY+XEjvBPtnXfVAQLdmgP9EAJzYtvuXHFJ1DoWj42QOT79xCqpxNMs qcLDF9sRCprrzMWHrjlUcC0NZmBJGXotB4TNMO2CtkwbidiIBweo0xwdgwaUDCED gV+tzrtQtIx516Lv/7gfR08yDl3TmkckVOmaQrQ2RT6QiRuT59+IkhIG9yKlbezn oo+dODRTYRQ= =6eYL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
