"Guido van Rossum" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Since next() is equivalent to send(None) we don't really need the > next() method do we?
As long as its renamed to __next__, then we seemingly wouldn't need next, though users needing to use next(X) or X.send(None) instead of X.next(), may be confusing and inconvenient. Should send get a default value of None? - Josiah _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
