On Wed, Mar 14, 2007 at 06:59:03AM -0800, Guido van Rossum wrote:
> I really don't like to have to write int('660', 8). How about 0t660?
> This is most symmetric with 0xffe for hex, as it is the 3rd letter of
> the word in both cases.
>
> I think we also approved 0b101010 for binary numbers, didn't we? Other
> bases don't have enough of a following to bother.
0b101010
0c660
0xffe
I.e. the first letter from "bin", the second from "oct", the third from
"hex". Also "0c" resembles "oc" from "oct".
Oleg.
--
Oleg Broytmann http://phd.pp.ru/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmers don't die, they just GOSUB without RETURN.
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
