Nick Coghlan wrote: > I think the point is for there to be something in the standard library > or Python core that makes it easy for a consumer to *copy* the data to a > contiguous memory segment in the event the consumer can't directly > handle non-contiguous data
It would be even more useful if the destination could be non-contiguous as well, but with a different stride. Then you could go from contiguous to non-contiguous, non-contiguous to contiguous, or repack between two different non-contiguous formats. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
