I know this was in my early lists of "clean up the language" plans for Py3k, but I think it's not worth the hassle.
On 3/23/07, Terry Reedy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > "Aahz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > | IIRC, there was some discussion about removing single-line blocks like > | this one in 3.0: > | > | if foo: bar() > | > | However, I can't find any discussion about making it happen, and it's > | not in PEP 3099. Guido, does this need a PEP? Do you want it to happen? > > To me, such constructions are sometimes more readable than the alternative. > So, unless there was a strong, not-yet-presented technical argument for the > change, I would strongly oppose mere stylistic imperialism. > > tjr > > > > _______________________________________________ > Python-3000 mailing list > Python-3000@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/guido%40python.org > -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
