I had another idea on this theme.. going by unicode and raw string literals, how about s[1, 2, 3, 4] for a set?
Eoghan On 17/04/07, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DillonCo wrote: > Why not use "<>" for sets? Some possible reasons: * It would look ugly * There could be visual confusion with comparison operators * There could be parsing difficulties distinguishing nested set bracketing from << and >> operators -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/eoghan%40qatano.com
-- http://qatano.com/ http://eoghan.qatano.org/ +353 86 236 1190
_______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
