On 4/23/07, Daniel Stutzbach <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > So you can see the performance of the BList in more detail, I've made > several performance graphs available at the following link: > http://stutzbachenterprises.com/blist/
Very cool. These detailed timings are very useful. Might it be possible to include variance bars? A few of the graphs show your data structure faster than the list even for small N, and it would be great to see if it is meaningfully faster in these cases (if so, perhaps there are optimization possibilities for the current list data structure). A quite glance at your results shows a few more cases where the blist faces problems, such no longer using Timsort, and so suffering in performance for sorted/reversed cases. That would be painful to give up in the built-in list implementation. -Mike _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com