Jim Jewett wrote:
> Yes, but it is a TypeError today. Is it worth the backwards
> compatibility?
I'd say yes for the sake of doing things right, in particular as we are
talking about Py3k, but then I don't think I have a good picture of all
the things that would be broken by this change.
> That makes sense. Looking at unordered containers like sets, should
>
> {"a", "b"} in {"b", "a", "d"} be able to return true, by deriving from
> Searchable?
No. {"a", "b"} clearly is a subset of {"b", "a", "d"}, not an element. So
{"a", "b"} < {"b", "a", "d"}, but {"a", "b"} not in {"b", "a", "d"}.
--
Thomas
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
