On 4/29/07, "Martin v. Löwis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Are we going to have a preference over PyObject_HEAD or defining the > > struct field directly? > > That is an open issue. PyObject_HEAD clearly is more > backwards-compatible. However (besides its current non-C-conformance), > I never liked it, because of the missing semicolon (I thought it > confuses Emacs, but can't reproduce the problem anymore, though - > perhaps it did confuse Emacs in the past?) > > So I personally would phase it out for style reasons, but others > may think differently; if I hear opinions in either direction, > I'm happy to code them into the PEP. >
I say phase out the macro. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
