On 5/2/07, Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally, I'm -1 on nuking implicit string concatenation; the
> examples provided for the 'why' aren't that strong in my experience,
> and the forced shift to concattenation is rather annoying when you're
> dealing with code limits (80 char limit for example)-
>
> dprint("depends level cycle: %s: "
> "dropping cycle for %s from %s" %
> (cur_frame.atom, datom,
> cur_frame.current_pkg),
> "cycle")
>
FWLIW, I pretty much always write this as::
msg = "depends level cycle: %s: dropping cycle for %s from %s"
tup = cur_frame.atom, datom, cur_frame.current_pkg, "cycle"
dprint(msg % tup)
But yes, occasionally I run into problems when the string still
doesn't fit on a single line. (Of course, I usually solve that by
shortening the string...) ;-)
STeVe
--
I'm not *in*-sane. Indeed, I am so far *out* of sane that you appear a
tiny blip on the distant coast of sanity.
--- Bucky Katt, Get Fuzzy
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
