On 5/1/07, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martin v. Löwis wrote: > > > http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2006-April/001526.html > > > > where Guido states that he trusts me that it can be made to work, > > and that "eventually" it needs to be supported.
+0 > He says "the tools aren't ready yet", which I take to > mean that Python won't need to support it until all > widely-used editors, email and news software, etc, etc, > reliably support displaying and editing of all > unicode characters. We're clearly a long way from > that situation. Couldn't the same argument be applied against non-ascii characters in string literals? It would be safest to enforce the use of \u escapes, no? It is certainly true that the use of non-ascii indentifiers will cause the code to be unusable by _someone_ using _some_ set of tools. This is something that the user will be aware of (as all new users of non-ascii have been in the past). Tools won't change without bug reports. -Mike _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com