On 02/05/2007 20.15, Guido van Rossum wrote: > I am worried that (as no indent is required on the next line) it will > accidentally introduce legal interpretations for certain common (?) > typos, e.g. > > x = y+ # Used to be y+1, the 1 got dropped > f(x)
It would also change the meaning of existing valid programs such as: x = 1, y() The additional ident would solve this of course, but as you already said it's a bad idea from an implementation standpoint. -- Giovanni Bajo _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
