On 09/05/07, Jim Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Maybe the tool has gotten smart enough to avoid constructions like:
>
> for k, v in list(dict.items()):
>
> for i in list(range(10)):
>
> but I can't help feeling there will always be a few cases where it
> makes the code longer and worse.
Why don't you (in these cases) change your 2.x code to
for k, v in dict.iteritems():
for i in xrange(10):
Then 2to3 will do the right thing, *and* your 2.x code is improved...
> knowing it will run OK in both versions. I will not be happy if I
> have to do this editing more than once.
If you edit the 2.6 source, you only need to do that once.
Paul.
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
