On 5/14/07, Paul Moore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > However, it looks like > there's a general feeling emerging that snipping certain sections > would be enough. I'd agree with that - my personal feeling is that > it'd be OK to remove all of the following sections: > > * "Before" and "After" Methods (as per Steven Bethard's suggestion) > * "Around" Methods (as per Steven Bethard's suggestion) > * Custom Combinations (as per Steven Bethard's suggestion) > * Interfaces and Adaptation (doesn't feel like a core aspect of the proposal) > * Aspects (as per Steven Bethard's suggestion) > * Extension API (currently empty, and that hasn't hampered the discussions!!) > > I'd be OK with them going into an additional PEP, but to be honest, it > wouldn't bother me to see them left out of the PEP process > altogether[1]. (I don't feel that I have enough experience with > *using* GFs to comment meaningfully, so I'd be willing to defer to > Phillip's judgement here).
That would suit me fine, since my inclination is to approve some form of the basics of the PEP (with reservations I will explain in another message) but to reject the second PEP. > [1] But I'd like to see them documented in the final implementation - > I'm not suggesting they be undocumented features. I'm suggesting they aren't features at all, except for the extension API. All the other stuff should be addable in a separate module using the extension API. -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com