On May 21, 2007, at 6:31 PM, Martin v. Löwis wrote: > This is indeed more conservative, and I could happily put it > in the PEP, but again I prefer not to do so without an explicit > confirmation from a user of such a language that this actually > helps anything. > > tomer's comment (that you need the mark even inside an identifier) > has puzzled me.
I agree: nothing should be done without an explicit example of how it will actually improve matters. For example: editor XYZ can be used to sensibly edit JS/C#/Java/whatever code in an RTL language, and could also be used to edit python if only python did <insert helpful thing here>. Anything else seems to be simply wild speculation, and should not be implemented on the off chance that it might be useful in the future. James _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
