On 5/23/07, Jim Jewett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 5/23/07, Ka-Ping Yee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > First: the "Common Objections" section of the PEP is too thin. I'd > > like the following arguments to be mentioned there for the record: > > > 4. Python programs that reuse other Python modules may come > > to contain a mix of character sets such that no one can > > fully read them or properly display them. > > 4.a > > Certain cut-and-paste errors (such as cutting from a word document > that uses "smart quotes") will change from syntax errors to silently > creating new identifiers.
Is this actually true? Are the fancy quote characters really going to be in the set of characters that would valid in identifiers, as proposed? -- Christopher Armstrong International Man of Twistery http://radix.twistedmatrix.com/ http://twistedmatrix.com/ http://canonical.com/ _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
