Guido van Rossum wrote: > Well, I would have complained about that too, except I was too busy > when splitlines() was snuck into the language behind my back. :-) I > should add that it has never caused me grief even though it is > flagrant disagreement with Python's general concept of line endings.
Personally I wouldn't object if you reverted that and only allowed "\n" in splitlines. Having one and only one internal representation for line endings seems like a good thing. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
