>> > Python currently provides to everyone the restriction of >> > identifiers to a character set that everyone knows and trusts. >> > Many of us want Python to continue to provide such restriction >> > for those who want identifiers to be in a character set they >> > know and trust. This is not incompatible with your desire to >> > permit alternative character sets, as long as Python offers an >> > option to make that choice. We can continue to discuss the >> > details of how that choice is expressed, but this general idea >> > is a solution that would give us both what we want. >> > >> > Can we agree on that? >> >> So far, all proposals I have seen *are* incompatible, or had >> some other flaws, so I'm not certain that this general idea >> provides a non-empty solution set. > > python -ascii-only
That doesn't implement the requirement "restriction for those who want identifiers to be in a character set they know and trust", if that character set is not ASCII. It also fails Guido's requirement "no global options", which is "some other flaw". Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com