Thanks, you're right, I've fixed it. On 6/19/07, Eric V. Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Guido van Rossum wrote: > > I've written up a comprehensive status report on Python 3000. Please read: > > > > http://www.artima.com/weblogs/viewpost.jsp?thread=208549 > > I think this sentence: > > "Python 2.6 will contain backported versions of many Py3k features, > either enabled through __future__ statements or simply by allowing old > and new syntax to be used side-by-side (if the new syntax would be a > syntax error in 2.x)." > > Should end with "syntax error in 2.5", not "syntax error in 2.x". Or, > state that x <= 5, in this sentence only. But I think we really mean > exactly 2.5. > > Eric. >
-- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
