On 6/29/07, Leonardo Santagada <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Em 29/06/2007, às 11:49, Guido van Rossum escreveu: > > > If I have any say in it, unittest isn't going away (unless replaced by > > something very similar, and doctest ain't it). Religion is all fine > > and well, as long as there's room for other views. I personally find > > using unit tests a lot easier than using doctest, for many of the > > things I tend to do (and most of my co-workers at Google see it that > > way, too). > > py.test is similar enough to replace unittest?
I've never looked at py.test, so I can't tell. There needs to be a 100% backwards-compatible API so existing unittests don't need to be changed (as they are the cornerstone of any transition to Python 3000). -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
