Tarfile is not from the 1.x days. But you're right, it's hairy. It
also changes too much (e.g. between 2.4.1 and 2.4.3 a refactoring
happened that also caused a new bug. The code has evolved quite a bit
since then and is still evolving... ;-( )
On 7/24/07, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Guido van Rossum wrote:
> > On 7/24/07, Lisandro Dalcin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Afther checking out the py3k-struni branch, 'make install' issued this:
> >>
> >> Compiling /usr/local/python/3.0/lib/python3.0/test/test_tarfile.py ...
> >> *** SyntaxError: ('expected string, bytes found',
> >> ('/usr/local/python/3.0/lib/python3.0/test/test_tarfile.py', 0, 0,
> >> None))
> >>
> >> If this is expected to fail, please forget this.
>
> It should not faild but we know that it is failing. The module isn't
> easy to fix either. I spent about an hour on tarfile.py without any
> luck. It's a beast and seems to be rather old style code from the Python
> 1.x days.
>
> Christian
>
> _______________________________________________
> Python-3000 mailing list
> Python-3000@python.org
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
> Unsubscribe:
> http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/guido%40python.org
>
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
