On 8/2/07, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Neal Norwitz wrote: > > Since there is a merged int/long type now, we need to decide how the C > > API should look. For example, should the APIs be prefixed with > > PyInt_* or PyLong_? > > I've always assumed it would be Py_Int*. If any > integer can be any length, it doesn't make sense > to have any length-related words in the names.
Aside from the name, are there other issues you can think of with any of the API changes? There are some small changes, things like macros only having a function form. Are these a problem? Str/unicode is going to be a big change. Any thoughts there? n _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
