Greg Ewing wrote: > Ron Adam wrote: >> Truncating behavior is >> explicitly specified by giving a max_width size without a replacement >> character. > > I think that would be an extremely bad default for numbers.
It's *not* a default. The default is to have no max_width. > > I believe they will learn fairly quickly what not to do. > > Even if that's true, why make the behaviour that's desirable > in the vast majority of cases more difficult to specify? > > -- > Greg > _______________________________________________ > Python-3000 mailing list > Python-3000@python.org > http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 > Unsubscribe: > http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/rrr%40ronadam.com > > _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
