Ron Adam wrote: > Would some sort of an indirect reference type help. Possibly an > object_id_based_reference as keys instead of using or hashing the object > itself? This wouldn't change if the object mutates between accesses and > could be immutable.
But if the object did mutate, the cached re would be out of date, and this wouldn't be noticed. -- Greg Ewing, Computer Science Dept, +--------------------------------------+ University of Canterbury, | Carpe post meridiem! | Christchurch, New Zealand | (I'm not a morning person.) | [EMAIL PROTECTED] +--------------------------------------+ _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
