Brett> But how is::
Brett> "{0} is happy to see {1}".format('Brett', 'Christian')
Brett> that less easier to read than::
Brett> "%s is happy to see %s" % ('Brett', 'Christian')
Brett> ? Yes, PEP 3101 style is more to type but it isn't grievous; we
Brett> have just been spoiled by the overloading of the % operator. And
Brett> I don't know how newbies think these days, but I know I find the
Brett> numeric markers much easier to follow then the '%s', especially
Brett> if the string ends up becoming long.
If you decide to insert another format token in the middle the new is more
error-prone than the old:
"{0} asks {1} if he is happy to see {1}".format('Brett', 'Skip',
'Christian')
^^^ whoops
vs:
"%s asks %s if he is happy to see %s" % ('Brett', 'Skip', 'Christian')
Now extend that to format strings with more than a couple expansions.
Brett> This is where the cranky python-dev'er comes in: PEP 3101 was
Brett> published in April 2006 which is over a year ago! This is not a
Brett> new PEP or a new plan.
Yes, but Python 3 is more real today than 15 months ago, hence the greater
focus now than before.
Skip
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
