Dnia 04-09-2007, Wt o godzinie 11:09 +0200, Georg Brandl napisał(a): > Even if it's true that a loop over items is more common than a loop over keys, > "x in keys" is much more common than "x in items".
In my language iterating over dict yields (key,value) pairs, but the equivalent of "x in dict" checks whether a key is present. My Kogut<->Python binding is smart enough to convert these conventions (which needed some work anyway because tuples could not be converted implicitly between the languages). An ugly part of the conversion was distinguishing between Python dictionaries, sequences and sets by the presence of some methods. For the curious, bits of the binding are at http://kokogut.cvs.sourceforge.net/kokogut/kokogut/lib/Python/Foreign/Python/Collection.ko?view=markup http://kokogut.cvs.sourceforge.net/kokogut/kokogut/lib/Python/Foreign/Python/KogutObject.ko?view=markup -- __("< Marcin Kowalczyk \__/ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/ _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
