Terry Reedy wrote: > "Sascha Peilicke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > | is or has there been any discussion about stackless and py3k? > > No. C. Tismer has focused his current efforts on PyPy.
That seems like the right strategy to me. Rather than focusing on a specific implementation, it seems better to me to work on an abstract representation of the Python language which can be "rendered" into various implementations. I think for those people in that other thread about threads (which I won't mention by name for fear of bringing that thread over here), that the ultimate solution to Python concurrency won't be via patching CPython, but to compile the meta-Python language to a back-end representation that is inherently concurrent. -- Talin _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
