"Nick Coghlan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Brett Cannon wrote: | > +1 from me. | | Looks good to me too: +1 | | I wouldn't mind seeing some iteration-in-C bit-bashing operations in | there eventually, but they aren't needed on the first pass, and even | being able to do things like the following will be a decent improvement | over the status quo for low-level bitstream manipulation: | | data = bytes([x & 0x1F for x in orig_data])
If orig_data were mutable (the new buffer, as proposed in the PEP), would not for i in range(len(orig_data)): orig_data[i] &= 0x1F do it in place? (I don't have .0a1 to try on the current bytes.) tjr _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
