On 10/19/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 10/7/07, Guido van Rossum <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd like to make complete implementation of PEP 3137 the goal for the > > 3.0a2 release. It should be doable to do this release by the end of > > October. I don't think anything else *needs* to be done to have a > > successful a2 release. > > I'm still hopeful, though realistically we may not quite make it. > Here's a status update on the issues I identified in my last message > (plus some identified afterwards): [SNIP] > > > - make == and != between PyString and Pyunicode return False instead > > of converting > > A patch by Thomas Lee exists: http://bugs.python.org/issue1263 > However it breaks some unit tests. > [SNIP] > A patch by Alexandre Vassalotti exists but breaks some unit tests: > http://bugs.python.org/issue1280 > > > - change PyString's repr() to return "b'...'" > > - change PyBytes's repr() to return "buffer(b'...')" > > - change parser so that b"..." returns PyString, not PyBytes > > - rename bytes -> buffer, str8 -> bytes > > A patch by Alexandre Vassolotti and Christian Heimes exists for these 4 items: > http://bugs.python.org/issue1247 > However it breaks too many tests to be applied right now. [SNIP] > > - move initialization of sys.std{in,out,err} into C code and do it earlier. > > A patch by Christian Heimes exists: http://bugs.python.org/issue1267 > However it still breaks some unit tests...
With so many patches now floating around, I figure getting some help with patch approval is probably the most useful. Is there a specific patch you would like to see get applied above the others? Or does it not matter and one should just grab any of them and just try to fix a test or two when one has the spare time? -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
