On 11/1/07, Ronald Oussoren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'm volunteering to keep improving PyObjC, but I won't promise that > PyObjC will be complete enough to replace the Carbon tree by the time > Python 3.0 goes into beta. Heck, just commiting the version of PyObjC > that is in Leopard into a public repository took me three weeks :-(
Which reminds me -- what version of Python is in Leopard? > Does anyone have suggestions on how to mobilize people for this > without scaring them away when explaining what needs to be done? > People, including myself to be honest, seem to find other things to do > when the realize that fixing the Carbon wrappers involves working > with and hacking on bgen :-( I admit bgen is too ancient and too ad-hoc to try and bother with (and I wrote most of it!). How would you solve the problem it solves today? -- --Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/) _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
