Guido van Rossum wrote: > We could use a better term than > buffer-API-supporting object though!
Especially if you're also going to be using the term 'buffer' for a particular Python type. That seems like a recipe for confusion to me. -- Greg _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
