At 03:48 PM 12/3/2007 +0100, Christian Heimes wrote: >Nick Coghlan wrote: > > Aren't the metaclass changes in PEP 3115 partially aimed at eliminating > > the need for stack frame hackery to implement these kinds of things? > > (e.g. the metaclass could stuff a closure into the class namespace under > > the name 'implements' to avoid any need for frame hackery). > >Couldn't we use a similar approach like the new super() magic? As far as >I remember super() can access its class through a new cell '__class__'. >Maybe we could introduce a similar way to access the namespace of a >class during its construction time?
You can already access it with locals(). It's just that without _getframe, you have to do something like 'implements(locals(), IExample)'. _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
