Guido van Rossum wrote: > I guess there's no such egneric wrapper in the core because the use > case hasn't presented itself before -- or nobody thought of creating a > generic solution. > > It's also possible that in the past this was done using unbound > methods -- so perhaps their removal from the method object may have > been premature.
I had the use case once as I fixed ctypes' COMError for 3.0a2 but it was easier to change the code than to come up with a generic wrapper type. A wrapper which takes a PyCFunction is definitely helpful and would make code porting from 2.x to 3.0 easier. I'm +1 to add one. Marcin, can you come up with a patch? Christian _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
