On Dec 26, 2007 2:40 PM, Christian Heimes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alexandre Vassalotti wrote: > > Well, I been working on branches since the beginning. Although, I now > > use Mercurial (which is lovely IMHO) to keep my changes (url: > > http://peadrop.com/alex-py3k/). > > Someday I need to play with Hg. It looks interesting and I've heard only > good about it. >
It is nice. Once Mercurial hits version 1.0 I am going to look at whether it is reasonable to move Python to hg or bzr to make it easier for people to do development on their own machines with local checkins instead of forcing people who can't create a branch to create their own VCS solution when doing offline work. > > How would that works? The modules in Module/config.c need to linked to > > the main binary, no? > > Correct! Do you want to build shared library extensions? > > Your problem is related to http://bugs.python.org/issue586680. It could > be fixed in two ways. Either we move initstdio() after initsite() > (Python/pythonrun.c) or we add the ./build/lib.<platform>-<version> to > sys.path before we initialize the standard streams. I would like to see the former option work. Keeps build dependencies down to a minimum. Otherwise the issue Christian references should be re-evaluated. But I personally would rather not see more stuff be built into Python, especially when it is optional in terms of Python's execution needs. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
