On Jan 10, 2008 8:39 AM, Joe Angell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > My apologies if this has been asked before, but are there any plans to > add the compiler module back in to py3k? If so, any idea on a > timeline? If help is needed I may be able to put in some time on > this. I've already back ported some of the py3k grammar (function > parameter annotations) to python 2.5.1 so I can use this with the > compiler module, but I think it would be sweet to just use py3k > directly.
As Guido said, it is not going back. But we would appreciate help in writing a function that takes Python's actual AST represesntation (as returned by compile()) and generated the proper bytecode from it. -Brett _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list [email protected] http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
