sorry, I meant __new__() not __init__(). For this crowd, I thought I'd put in the obvious correction. :)
On Jan 13, 2008 9:37 AM, Charles Merriam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I'm explicitly dropping this. So far no one has pointed out > any use cases that are not equivalent to intercepting an array of the > namespace in the __init__() of a subclass of type, then calling > type's __init__() on the modified namespace. Still, I do get a level > of snarky insults that leads me to believe this would involve dealing > with people who like the metaclass definition syntax to be hairy. > > Good luck! > > Charles > _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
