On Jan 30, 2008 4:01 PM, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Wouters wrote:
> >
> > On Jan 30, 2008 3:17 PM, Greg Ewing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote:
> >
> > Do you really want set comprehensions at all, given that
> > set(genexp) exists?
> >
> > Too late.
>
> I thought Guido said it wasn't too late to change this?
I don't recall saying this. The only aspect that I was almost okay
with changing was whether set displays (and by implication set
comprehensions; "literals" is really the wrong term given the example
{a, b}) could be changed to frozenset.
The more I think about it the less I like that alternative though. So
I think you're wasting your time (and mine :).
--
--Guido van Rossum (home page: http://www.python.org/~guido/)
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
