Dnia 03-02-2008, N o godzinie 10:24 +0900, Stephen J. Turnbull pisze:
> I don't see any need to shorten "python3.0" to "python3".
There is a need. Using #!/usr/bin/python3.0 would break as soon as
python3.1 is released, while #!/usr/bin/python3 would be fine, at least
in the next few years.
Using #!/usr/bin/python is not fine in an environment with both Python 2
and Python 3 installed, and such an environment is reasonable if one has
Python 2 programs running in production which have not been updated to
Python 3 yet, while he wants to start using Python 3 for other programs.
--
__("< Marcin Kowalczyk
\__/ [EMAIL PROTECTED]
^^ http://qrnik.knm.org.pl/~qrczak/
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe:
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
