-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On Feb 21, 2008, at 10:23 AM, Jean-Paul Calderone wrote:

> Wouldn't a less invasive solution be to make pdb better?  In  
> particular,
> to make `breakpoint´ actually reliably set a breakpoint?

Maybe, although I like the directness and simplicity of setting a  
break point explicitly in the code (maybe inside a conditional,  
etc.).  I just want to type less. :)

Well, it was probably a dumb idea anyway born of minor frustration, so  
I'll drop it.

- -Barry

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)

iQCVAwUBR8FjwnEjvBPtnXfVAQIvqQQApHsTLcflVp4TkVWNhgdRYTcIxaWCpOjS
9XCz40WKgh9tg0m4iiZng+g7/h2rtlL4ythRGJfNFXr0xEGEt62appu87XHOt00g
sOwLfglpRG/pA+RCnmrb/ezNCZMMJYjCfGbbN5huqb4EYUoAH2Pml5GjrG8bJN+G
gozq5Pb1Jxk=
=aELO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
Python-3000 mailing list
Python-3000@python.org
http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000
Unsubscribe: 
http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com

Reply via email to