>> When people requested that 2to3 is a library, I think they >> have exactly that use case in mind: programmatically convert >> a source code base at deployment/build time. > > For importability as a library, would it be better > to call it two2three?
Not sure whom you are asking. It's currently called lib2to3, so I can't see why two2three would be better (I just notice that it is more difficult to type for me than lib2to3). Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
