Eric Smith schrieb: > For example, say that 2to3 changes all instances of has_key to an "in" > expression (I'm not saying it does this or not, I really don't know). > If you have a Locksmith class that has a has_key method unrelated to > dicts, then 2to3 would break it. But it's certainly possible that you > could change the method name in your 2.6 code and avoid the problem. > You'd have 2.6 code that could automatically run in 3.0.
IIRC Collin is working on a system to skip those with a comment like #2to3: skip fixer_haskey if egg.has_key(spam): Christian _______________________________________________ Python-3000 mailing list Python-3000@python.org http://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-3000 Unsubscribe: http://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-3000/archive%40mail-archive.com
